USPTO serial 78435103
ANDREW WEIL MD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANDREW WEIL MD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce J. Goldner, Esq.
BRUCE J GOLDNER ESQ SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLPFOUR TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Beverageware, bakeware, cookware, namely, steamers, pots, pans, roasting pans; dinnerware, namely, cups, plates, bowls, serving dishes and platters; earthenware, namely, cups, plates, bowls, serving dishes; servingware for serving food; kitchen utensils, namely, graters, spatulas, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, turners, whisks, cooking sieves and sifters, and basting, mixing, serving and slotted spoons; household utensils, namely, bread baskets made of wicker, wood, straw, cloth, containers for household use; non-electric coffee makers, non-electric juicers, non-electric griddles, non-electric kettles; facial sponges for applying make-up, cosmetics accessories, namely, cosmetic removing paper, cotton balls, exfoliating pads; combs and hair brushes, manual and electric toothbrushes; shaving accessories, namely, shaving brushes; bath accessories, namely, bath brushes, bath sponges, loofah sponges; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, cleaning cloths, cleaning sponges, pot cleaning brushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |