Drawing for ETHERPLUG

USPTO serial 78435191

ETHERPLUG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETHERPLUG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith Kline

Keith Kline THE KLINE LAW FIRM161 Little Pond LanePalmyra, VA 22963-5161UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications hardware and software utilizing Ethernet, DSL, and SONET to deliver voice, data and Ethernet services, the hardware being modular chassis with interface slots that receive Ethernet and telecom modules, and fixed configuration channel service units that provide Ethernet and telecom interfacesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 16, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 3, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 18, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Sep 24, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance