USPTO serial 78435379
24-7 FITNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 24-7 FITNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
Kevin G. Smith SUGHRUE MION, PLLCSuite 800 2100 Pennsylvania Ave.NWWashington, DC 20037-3213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES; PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR SPORTS TOURNAMENTS NAMELY TENNIS, RACQUETBALL, AND SWIMMING; PUBLICATION OF AN ELECTRONIC NEWSLETTER IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS AND RECREATION; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES NAMELY, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, CLINICS, AND PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS, EXERCISE, CPR, SELF DEFENSE, YOGA AND DANCE; PROVIDING PERSONAL TRAINING SERVICES TO OTHERS | ABANDONED | Dec 17, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |