CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE STORYTABLE

USPTO serial 78435464

THE STORYTABLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE STORYTABLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ

RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ 1-800-4-TRADEMARKPO BOX 398538MIAMI BEACH, FL 33239-8538UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the InternetACTIVE—
041Educational demonstrations; arrangement of training courses in teaching institutes; training in the use and operation of computers; providing facilities for recreation activities; educational meeting and seminar arranging; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on-line featuring historic events; organizing exhibitions for cultural and educational purposes, namely, for educating others in the field of history; conducting cultural and educational workshops and seminars in the field of history; arranging and conducting educational and cultural conferences; providing facilities for educational and cultural conventions; entertainment services, namely, conducting educational and cultural fairs in facilities for the elderly; book, newspaper and magazine publishing; library services, namely, lending of books, newspaper, magazines and video and audio carriers; publishing and distribution of books, newspapers and magazines as well as related electronic data carriersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 5, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2007CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 29, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 29, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 18, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance