USPTO serial 78435481
RITUALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 2009
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with RITUALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RITUALS INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
Other trademarks owned by RITUALS INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
RITUALS INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS B.V.
1012 NZ AMSTERDAM, NL
Other trademarks owned by RITUALS INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS B.V.
RITUALS INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS B.V.
1012 NZ AMSTERDAM, NL
Other trademarks owned by RITUALS INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Mango
Thomas J. Mango Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | facial cream; facial lotion; [ pre-moistened cosmetic tissues; ] facial masks; shaving foam; shaving gel; shaving cream; after shave gel; after shave lotion; non-medicated skin care preparations; cosmetic preparations for body care; hand lotions and creams; shower soap; shower gel; shower foam; bath soap; bath oil; [ anti-perspirants and deodorants; ] [ soaps; ] shampoos, conditioners and hair care preparations; hair styling preparations, namely, styling gel, [ styling mousse, hair spray; ] perfumes; essential oils for personal use; cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RITUALS INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Masada B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by RITUALS INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by RITUALS INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named RITUALS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 29, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |