Drawing for JOHN MAYER

USPTO serial 78435554

JOHN MAYER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JOHN MAYER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J Reid Hunter

J Reid Hunter Serling Rooks & Ferrara LLP119 Fifth Avenue, 3rd FloorNew York, NY 10003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal dog tags; key chains made of metalACTIVE—
009Sunglasses; carrying cases for portable MP3 players; computer game software; computer software for recording and mixing musicACTIVE—
011FlashlightsACTIVE—
014Watches; necklaces; rings in the form of jewelry; lapel pins; ornamental pinsACTIVE—
015Guitars and carrying cases for musical instruments, namely guitarsACTIVE—
016Books in the field of entertainment; magazines featuring music and entertainmentACTIVE—
022Lanyards for holding badges and keysACTIVE—
026Belt buckles not of precious metalACTIVE—
028Skateboards, playing cardsACTIVE—
034Match boxes not of precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 15, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 22, 2008IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2008INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Dec 27, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 4, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance