USPTO serial 78435563
MOVIE SLOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOVIE SLOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carson C.K.Fincham
Carson C.K.Fincham WALKER DIGITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC2 HIGH RIDGE PARKSTAMFORD, CT 06905UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | GAMING MACHINES AND/OR GAMBLING MACHINES, NAMELY SLOT MACHINES, SOFTWARE FOR SUCH MACHINES, AND KITS FOR MODIFYING SUCH MACHINES AND SOFTWARE, SAID KITS COMPRISING NEW, UPDATED, AND/OR REPLACEMENT SOFTWARE, PARTS, AND/OR ACCESSORIES SUCH AS GLASS, REELS, GRAPHICS, PRINTING DEVICES, USER TRACKING DEVICES, CIRCUIT BOARDS, PROCESSORS, AND MACHINE ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS, RE-PROGRAMMING SOFTWARE, MODIFICATION INSTRUCTIONS, USER GUIDES, TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDES, AND/OR MACHINE SCHEMATICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |