USPTO serial 78435890
LEO WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEO WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-Shirts; Polo Shirts; Baseball Caps; Socks; Sweat Shirts; Athletic uniforms; Bathing suits; Beachwear; Bermuda shorts; Bicycling gloves; Bikinis; Blazers; Blouses; Boxer briefs; Boxer Shorts; Briefs; Camp shirts; Caps; Denim jackets; Dungarees; Fishing vests; Fleece pullovers; Footwear; Golf shirts; Gym shorts; Gym suits; Head bands; Headgear, namely, Caps and Hats; Hunting vests; Jackets; Jeans; Jogging suits; Knit shirts; Mock turtle-neck sweaters; Motorcycle gloves; Muffs; Neckerchiefs; Neckties; Neckwear; Pants; Pullovers; Ponchos; Rain jackets; Rain Suits; Sandals; Shirts; Shorts; Ski wear; Ski Suits; Skirts; Socks; sport shirts; Sport Coats; Sun visors; Surf Wear; Sweat bands; Sweat Pants; Sweat Shirts; Sweat shorts; Sweat Suits; Sweaters; Swim wear; swim Trunks; Tank tops; Tennis wear; Turtlenecks; Undershirts; Underwear; Warm up suits; Underpants; Wind resistant jackets; Wind shirts; and Wrist bands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |