USPTO serial 78435930
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, INSTRUMENTS, DEVICES AND MACHINES NAMELY, AUTOMATED DISPENSING MACHINES FOR DISPENSING BANK NOTES, COINS, TOKENS, MAGNETIC STRIP CARDS, CHIP CARDS OR MICRO-PROCESSOR CARDS AND DISPENSING RECEIPTS THEREFOR; VENDING MACHINES IN THE NATURE OF COIN AND BILL OPERATED MACHINES AND PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFOR NAMELY REPLACEMENT GRAPHICS AND SOFTWARE FOR VIDEO SLOT MACHINES; MAGNETIC CARDS FOR GAMING ACCESS TO TELEPHONE, BANK ACCOUNTS; COMPUTER CHIPS; MICRO-PROCESSORS; AUTOMATED DATA STORAGE DEVICES, NAMELY BLANK TAPES, BLANK CDS, BLANK DVDS; LASER DATA PRINTERS, ELECTRONIC PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS, CHANGE MACHINES, VENDING MACHINES PROVIDING CHITS, COUPONS, GAME CARDS; ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC MACHINES AND APPARATUSES FOR GAMES, AMUSEMENT; ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMING, NAMELY, SLOT MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFOR IN THE NATURE OF GAME SYMBOL CYLINDERS; GAMING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, GAMING MACHINES, VIDEO SLOT MACHINES, CASINO GAMBLING MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFOR; DROP-DOWN CAROUSELS FOR VIDEO SLOT MACHINES; TV-MONITORS, LCD-DISPLAY MONITORS, ALL FOR GAMING MACHINES; ELECTRONIC CASINO GAMES IN THE NATURE OF VIDEO SLOT MACHINES; ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC GAMING AND GAMBLING MACHINES; ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC MACHINES AND APPARATUSES FOR GAMING AND GAMBLING MACHINES; COMPUTER GAME CASSETTE CARTRIDGES OR CARDS FOR ELECTRONIC POCKET GAMES, VIDEO GAMES AND ACCESSORIES THEREOF; VIDEO DISCS, PRERECORDED MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS PROGRAMMED FOR ELECTRONIC VIDEO AND AUDIO DISPLAY AND OPERATION FOR POCKET GAMES, VIDEO GAMES | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | COIN-OPERATED COMPACT SPORTS VIDEO GAMES, COMPACT SPORTS APPARATUS FOR PLAYING IN SMALL AREAS, NAMELY, DARTS, TABLE SOCCER, POOL-BILLIARD, SNOOKER BALLS, SHOOTING GALLERIES, CARD- AND BOARD GAMES, HAND-OPERATED CONSOLES FOR ELECTRONIC PARLOR GAMES, STAND-ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |