USPTO serial 78436034
THE DELICIOUS, HEALTH CONSCIOUS CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE DELICIOUS, HEALTH CONSCIOUS CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil M. Zipkin
NEIL M ZIPKIN AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FROZEN, PREPARED AND PACKAGED ENTREES AND CASSEROLES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEATS, CHEESE, VEGETABLES; PROCESSED VEGETABLES; SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, POTATO-BASED SNACK FOODS, PROTEIN-BASED SNACK FOODS, AND SOY-BASED SNACK FOODS; FOOD ADDITIVES IN THE NATURE OF A PROTEIN FOR NUTRITIONAL PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | FROZEN, PREPARED AND PACKAGED ENTREES AND CASSEROLES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA AND SAUCES; CHEESES, CHEESE SUBSTITUTES, CHEESE SAUCE, PIZZA, BAKERY GOODS, COOKIES, INGREDIENTS FOR BAKED GOODS NAMELY FLOUR, FLAVORINGS, TOMATO SAUCES; PASTA, CHEESECAKE, LASAGNA, MACARONI AND CHEESE, MACARONI SALAD, RICE, RISOTTO, SPAGHETTI, SPAGHETTI SAUCE, TOMATO SAUCE; BREAD CRUMBS, PIZZA CRUST, PIZZA DOUGH, SNACK FOODS, NAMELY CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOODS, WHEAT-BASED SNACK FOODS, RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS; FOOD ADDITIVES FOR NON-NUTRIONAL PURPOSES, RICE FOR USE AS CHEESE EXTENDERS; CHEESE FLAVORED SNACKS, NAMELY CHEESE BALLS; CHEESE BASED SNACK FOODS; CRACKER AND CHEESE COMBINATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rizza Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rizza Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named THE DELICIOUS, HEALTH CONSCIOUS CHOICE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |