Drawing for ELECTRIC LINGERIE

USPTO serial 78436187

ELECTRIC LINGERIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELECTRIC LINGERIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles P. LaPolla

Charles P. LaPolla Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, LLP1180 Avenue of the Americas7th FloorNew York, NY 10036-8403

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Sexy lingerie, bras, panties, underwear, clubwear, namely, sequined tops and pants, dance tops, dance pants; -ACTIVESep 30, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 15, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 14, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 6, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 6, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 30, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance