CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ROKA

USPTO serial 78436503

ROKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3156133Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Mikulina

JENNIFER M. MIKULINA MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP227 W. MONROE STREETSUITE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant servicesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2009C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 9, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2008C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jan 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance