Drawing for INTEGRATION AGENT

USPTO serial 78436662

INTEGRATION AGENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRATION AGENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Pecsenye

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQ 9TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE INTEGRATION OF DATA BETWEEN LABORATORY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER EXTERNAL APPLICATIONSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 25, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 25, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jun 13, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 11, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 8, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 21, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 21, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 24, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 12, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 7, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 26, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 25, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 26, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 22, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance