Drawing for KINGSDOWN MIRACLE KIDS

USPTO serial 78436722

KINGSDOWN MIRACLE KIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KINGSDOWN MIRACLE KIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin G. Smith

KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Charitable fundraising servicesACTIVENov 30, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 11, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 11, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 23, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
May 16, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance