Drawing for Serial No. 78436942

USPTO serial 78436942

Serial No. 78436942

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 78436942?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006ground spikes made primarily of metal for anchoring and supporting postsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2009UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 26, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2008UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 25, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 11, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 20, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 20, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 8, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 7, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance