USPTO serial 78437128
AETERNA ZENTARIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AETERNA ZENTARIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
Mark I. Peroff Wilson Keadjian Browndorf LLP114 W. Forty Seventh Street - 18th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of cancer, pharmaceutical preparations administered as a radiosensitizer and used for the treatment of cancer, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of urological diseases, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of hormonal disorders, peptides-containing pharmaceutical preparations used for hormonal and tumors treatments, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of endocrine diseases, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of carcinoid tumors, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of hematological diseases, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of age-related diseases, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of ophtalmological disorders, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of reproductive system disorders, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of endometriosis, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of uterine myoma, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of non-malignant tumors, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of tropical diseases, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of infectious disease, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of leishmaniasis, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of obesity, pharmaceutical preparations used for the treatment of diabetes and disorders related to diabetes, pharmaceutical preparations containing conjugated and non-conjugated cytotoxic products used to selectively and specifically target certain types of cancer; pharmaceutical preparations used as a tubulin inhibitor, pharmaceutical preparations based on LHRH antagonists platform used for the treatment of certain types of cancer and endocrine disorders, pharmaceutical preparations based on bombesin antagonist platform used for the treatment of certain types of cancer, pharmaceutical preparations based on inhibitors of the Akt pathway used for the treatment of certain types of cancer, pharmaceutical preparations based on angiogenesis inhibitors platform with multiple mechanisms of action used for the treatment of certain types of cancer, pharmaceutical preparations used to induce apoptosis, pharmaceutical preparations used to stimulate growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |