USPTO serial 78437285
FRESH WALA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESH WALA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce S. Londa
BRUCE S LONDA NORRIS, MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS PA875 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 11205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Pickles, potato chips, preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; preserved dates; fruit bars in the nature of fruit based snack food, edible oils and fats, jellies, jams; eggs, milk; milk products, namely butter, cheese, ghee, milk powder; meat, meat extracts, fish, poultry and game; papad (lentil chips) | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | fruit ice bar; spices, packed masalas being spices, curry pastes, condiments, namely ketchup; asafoetida being spices, instant pancake mixes, biscuits, wafers, cookies, peanut candy; vermicelli, noodles; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely cereal-based snack foods; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely candy; coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee, flavored ices; honey, yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |