Drawing for CORTISCULPT

USPTO serial 78437338

CORTISCULPT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORTISCULPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Lantz

JENNIFER M LANTZ MACPHERSON KWOK CHEN & HEID LLP2033 GATEWAY PL STE 400SAN JOSE, CA 95110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary SupplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 8, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 7, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance