Drawing for ANNTAYLOR LOFT

USPTO serial 78437995

ANNTAYLOR LOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANNTAYLOR LOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather L. Jensen

HEATHER L JENSEN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024HOME FURNISHINGS, NAMELY PILLOW CASES, PILLOW SHAMS, DUST RUFFLES, BED SHEETS, BED SKIRTS, COMFORTERS, BLANKET COVERS, DUVET COVERS, COMFORTER COVERS, BED BLANKETS, BEDSPREADS, QUILTS, TOWELS, WASH CLOTHS, SHOWER CURTAINS, TEXTILE PLACE MATS, TEXTILE TABLE CLOTHS, TEXTILE NAPKINS, TABLE LINENS, WINDOW CURTAINS, AND DRAPERIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 15, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 12, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance