USPTO serial 78438045
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Radiance Medspa Franchise Group, PLLC
Scottsdale, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Radiance Medspa Franchise Group, PLLC
Radiance Medspa Franchise Group, PLLC
Scottsdale, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Radiance Medspa Franchise Group, PLLC
Radiance Medspa Franchise Group, PLLC
Scottsdale, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Radiance Medspa Franchise Group, PLLC
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | cosmetic skin care services, namely primarily aesthetic non-invasive medical treatment modalities including photo skin rejuvenation which will provide treatments for rosacea, pigmented lesion reduction, sun damage, vascular treatment, laser/light-based hair removal, microdermabrasion, and chemical peels; as well as popular cosmetic filler treatments including restaylane and others | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2009 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |