USPTO serial 78438365
DIRECT REQUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2006
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DIRECT REQUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WEST-COM NURSE CALL SYSTEMS, INC.
DANVILLE, CA, US
WEST-COM NURSE CALL SYSTEMS, INC.
DANVILLE, CA, US
WEST-COM NURSE CALL SYSTEMS, INC.
Fairfield, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dale Paul DiMaggio
Dale Paul DiMaggio MALIN HALEY DIMAGGIO & BOWEN, P.A.4901 NW 17TH WAY, SUITE 308FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical device for communication by and between patients and healthcare or hospital personnel, for patients requiring pain medication, bed pan services or the like, said communications being automatically sent to predetermined and specific personnel, sold as an integral component part of nurse call pillow speakers | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WEST-COM NURSE CALL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WEST-COM NURSE CALL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WEST-COM NURSE CALL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DIRECT REQUEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 1, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |