USPTO serial 78438594
Serial No. 78438594
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78438594?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DALE PAUL DIMAGGIO, ESQ.
DALE PAUL DIMAGGIO ESQ MALIN, HALEY & DIMAGGIO PA1936 S ANDREWS AVEFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic apparatus used in nurse call systems, namely, an electronic device for automatically sending communication transmissions between patients and predetermined and/or specified health care or hospital personnel for use by patients requiring bed pan or other nursing services | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2005 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |