Drawing for EDUTI

USPTO serial 78438889

EDUTI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDUTI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq.

Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041-2008

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and peripherals; computer software for collaboration, communication and learning using PC's and/or via local, wide area and global computer networks, and wireless communication devices and manuals supplied therewithACTIVE—
042Installation of computer software for collaboration, communication and learning using PCs and/or via local, wide area and global computer networks, and wireless communication devices; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer software for collaboration, communication and learning using PCs and/or via local, wide area and global computer networks, and wireless communication devices; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others in the field of collaboration, communication and learning using PCs and/or via local, wide area and global computer networks, and wireless communication devices; maintenance of computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems for software in the field of collaboration, communication and learning using PCs and/or via local, wide area and global computer networks, and wireless communication devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance