Drawing for COPPER BEACH FURNITURE

USPTO serial 78439075

COPPER BEACH FURNITURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COPPER BEACH FURNITURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony de Fazekas

ANTHONY DE FAZEKAS MILLER THOMSON LLP20 QUEEN ST W STE 2500TORONTO, ON M5H 3S1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Indoor and outdoor furnitureACTIVE—
035Wholesale distributorship featuring indoor and outdoor furnitureACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture of indoor and outdoor furnitureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance