USPTO serial 78439146
IRIDESSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IRIDESSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE D MANDEL
LAWRENCE D MANDEL, LLC MANDEL & PESLAK80 SCENIC DRIVE SUITE 5FREEHOLD, NJ 07728UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS; PERFUMES; HEALTH AND BEAUTY, BATH AND BODY, AND NAIL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PRESSED POWDER, DUSTING POWDER, MASCARA APPLICATOR CONTAINING MASCARA, LIPSTICK, EYE-SHADOW AND APPLICATORS, LIQUID FOUNDATION MAKE-UP, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, BLUSHER, EYELINER, EYE-SHADOW, EYE-SHADOW PENCILS, COSMETIC EYELASHES, NAIL WRAPS, NAIL STRENGTHENER, PRESS-ON-NAILS, TALC, PERFUMES, EAU DE TOILETTE, HAIR GEL AND MOUSSE, SHAMPOO, CONDITIONERS, HAIRSPRAY, BODY CREAM, BODY LOTION, SHOWER GEL, BATH SOAP, HAIR CONDITIONERS, COLOGNES, COLOGNE SPRAYS, AFTER SHAVE CREAM AND GEL, AFTER-SHAVE BALM | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |