USPTO serial 78439259
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Noventa Vicentina (Vicenza), IT
Noventa Vicentina (Vicenza), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Murtaugh
John P. Murtaugh Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th Street, Suite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Earth-working machines and apparatus, namely, bulldozers, swamp bulldozers, amphibious bulldozers, tire dozers, motor scrapers, towed scrapers, rippers and rake dozers; earth-handling machines and apparatus, namely, shovel loaders, wheel loaders, tractor loaders, compactors and loader buckets; snow plows; excavators, namely, back-hoes, dozer-shovels, swamp-type dozer shovels, swing dozer shovels, powershovels, bucket excavators, mining shovels, trenchers, and tunnel boring machines; construction machines and apparatus, namely, drop-hammers, tire-rollers, road rollers, asphalt finishers, vibration rollers, vibroplates, pipe-laying machines, and motor graders; metal-working machines and apparatus, namely, mechanical presses, hydraulic presses, extrusion presses, forging presses, press brakes, bending machines, shearing machines, stretching machines, peeling machines, gun-drill machines, crankpin millers, crankshaft millers, cylinder block deburring machines, slug choppers, slug upsetters, lathes, molding machines, engraving-type laser marking machines (for metal surfaces), mask-type laser marking machines (for plastic surfaces), laser-marker controller, other molding machines, and machine tools; loaders, stackers, reclaimers; belt-conveyors; generators or dynamos, chain saws; bush cutters; air compressors; truck cranes; engines and transmissions for said goods; parts and attachments for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electronic seat position system control for earth-working machines; protective helmets; silicon wafers; silicon semiconductors; integrated circuits; optical integrated circuits; blank magnetic tapes and cards; blank floppy discs and cards; computer software for the purpose of control and/or maintenance of machines and apparatus for mining, earth-working, earth-handling, construction, metal working and also of land vehicles; electronic visual-sensor device for inspection purposes of electrical and electronic machines and components thereof by utilizing gray-scale treatment; machines and apparatus for laser-marking | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Transportation vehicles, namely, forklift trucks, electric lift trucks, electric reach trucks, tractors, towing tractors, dump trucks, concrete-mixer trucks; engines and transmissions for said land vehicles; parts and attachments for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |