USPTO serial 78439307
CLEAN EDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2008
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CLEAN EDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PASADENA, CA
PASADENA, CA
PASADENA, CA
FRAMINGHAM, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Benni
Todd A. Benni McDonald Hopkins LLC600 Superior AvenueSuite 2100Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Business cards | ACTIVE | Feb 20, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Avery Dennison Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Avery Dennison Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Avery Dennison Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by CCL LABEL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named CLEAN EDGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |