USPTO serial 78439566
FORMULA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORMULA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Beliveau
Susan M. Beliveau Susan M. Beliveau#202, 5005 24th StreetVernon, V1T 8X7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, the provision of live and recorded musical performances; entertainment services, namely, the provision of live or recorded musical and entertainment performances on the radio and/or on television; entertainment services, namely, the provision of live or recorded musical and entertainment performances and fan club services by means of a global computer network; recording studio services, namely, recording and producing musical and entertainment productions, namely, pre-recorded magnetic tapes, cassette tapes, compact discs, phonograph records, songbooks, digital video discs, video cassettes, multimedia software, music videos and/or CD ROMs; operation of a web site on a global computer network providing information on music, musicians and musical entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |