Drawing for LYRIC QUEST

USPTO serial 78440605

LYRIC QUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LYRIC QUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David C. West

FREDRIKSON & BYRON PADAVID C W200 S 6TH ST STE 4000, MN 55402-1425

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028board game featuring playing cards for playing a music trivia gameABANDONEDJun 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 13, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 13, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 14, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 15, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance