Drawing for THE AUTHORITY ON SPANISH FOODS

USPTO serial 78440732

THE AUTHORITY ON SPANISH FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE AUTHORITY ON SPANISH FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

STEPHEN L BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS PA575 ROUTE 28SUITE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Pens; posters; writing paper; printed material, namely, price lists and mail order catalogs featuring clocks, pot holders, aprons, magnetic note pads, note pads, cooking utensils, clothing, backpacks, toys, key rings, bibs for children, drinking utensils, cooler bags, writing instruments and umbrellas; note pads, and cookbooks; house Organ, namely, a periodical which is distributed by a business concern to its employees; and newsletters in the field of marketing and promotion of goods to the Spanish populationACTIVE—
041Educational and cultural services, namely, providing symposia and workshops concerning current marketing developments affecting the food and beverage product industries; Organization of exhibitions for cultural and educational purposes, namely, art exhibitions and ethnic foods and cooking exhibitions; Organizing exhibitions in the field of Hispanic culture, Hispanic cooking and Hispanic tradition; Instruction in the fields of history, culture, music and art rendered at art museums, conference centers and over the world wide webACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 29, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 23, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 23, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 5, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance