Drawing for CORTI SPORT

USPTO serial 78440949

CORTI SPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORTI SPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Lantz

Jennifer M. Lantz Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory AvenueSuite 700Dallas, TX 75219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 8, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 13, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 13, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2008UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Jan 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 31, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 31, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance