USPTO serial 78441672
APCG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2006
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with APCG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Allergy Practice Consulting Group, Inc.
McAllen, TX
Other trademarks owned by Allergy Practice Consulting Group, Inc.
Allergy Practice Consulting Group, Inc.
McAllen, TX
Other trademarks owned by Allergy Practice Consulting Group, Inc.
Allergy Practice Consulting Group, Inc.
McAllen, TX
Other trademarks owned by Allergy Practice Consulting Group, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick O. Strauss
PATRICK O. STRAUSS Allergy Practice Consulting Group, Inc.5200 N. McCollSuite 5McAllen, TX 78504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services relating to allergy and respiratory related testing and treatment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Allergy Practice Consulting Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Allergy Practice Consulting Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Allergy Practice Consulting Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named APCG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 24, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |