Drawing for LEUKOS THE JOURNAL OF THE ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA

USPTO serial 78441781

LEUKOS THE JOURNAL OF THE ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3154880Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 10, 2006
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with LEUKOS THE JOURNAL OF THE ILLUMINATING ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,700

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore D. Lienesch

Theodore D. Lienesch Thompson Hine LLP10050 Innovation Dr., Suite 400Miamsiburg, OH 45342-4934UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed peer reviewed publications in the field of illuminating engineering and technical aspects of lighting applicationsACTIVE—
041Publication of peer reviewed research papers on illuminating engineering and technical aspects of lighting applications; Providing on-line peer reviewed research papers on illuminating engineering and technical aspects of lighting applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 15, 2017COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 15, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 24, 2017ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 17, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 17, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 7, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 5, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 27, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 21, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 13, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 13, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 21, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2005CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2005GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance