USPTO serial 78441799
EFFICIENT - LASTING - SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3140006Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2006
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EFFICIENT - LASTING - SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
DALLAS, TX
Other trademarks owned by LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
DALLAS, TX
Other trademarks owned by LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
DALLAS, TX
Other trademarks owned by LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan D. Barson, Esq.
ALAN D BARSON ESQ LAW OFFICE OF ALAN D BARSON853 BROADWAY STE 1001NEW YORK, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | LED (light emitting diode) light bulbs; Illumination systems comprised primarily of LED light bulbs, LED light pods, LED lamps, LED lamps and their fittings, LED lighting fixtures or LED luminaries, for use in any application where highly energy efficient illumination is required including for use in domestic, consumer, vehicular, commercial, municipal, civil and military lighting applications wherever located including terrestrial, subterranean, underwater and spaced based illumination systems and devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LIGHTING SCIENCE GROUP CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Lighting Science, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named EFFICIENT - LASTING - SMART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 1, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |