USPTO serial 78441807
ACQUA DIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACQUA DIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Bottled natural water, namely, still drinking water | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |