USPTO serial 78441844
PHC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Payne
DAVID A PAYNE MEDLEN & CARROLL LLP101 HOWARD ST STE 350SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | In-home personal non-medical care services, namely, personal chef services and personal care assistance of activities of daily living, such as bathing, grooming, and personal mobility for mentally or physically challenged people | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |