USPTO serial 78442343
OPTAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Hunter
RONALD E HUNTER CARGILL, INCORPORATEDPO BOX 5624LAW DEPT MS 24MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-5624Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Meal replacement drinks, meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes, meal replacement powders, dietary meal replacement bars, and nutritional additives for use in foods and beverages all for human use | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Milk; yogurt; yogurt-based beverages; soy-based food beverages used as a milk substitute; natural and processed cheese; protein based, nutrient dense snack bars; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; dairy based beverages; and frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; confectionery coatings, namely, confectionery coatings consisting primarily of lemon, orange, yogurt, strawberry, and cherry | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Ice cream; ice milk; milk shakes; frozen yogurt; custards; puddings; bread; rolls; muffins; bagels; tortillas; crackers; quick breads; cookies; tea; candy; breakfast cereals; processed cereals; granola based snack bars; ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; and confectionery coatings, namely, confectionery coatings consisting primarily of cinnamon butterscotch caramel, coffee, mocha, vanilla, and chocolate | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | fruit juices; fruit drinks; fruit flavored soft drinks; smoothies; concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of beverages; fruit nectars; and sports drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cargill, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Cargill, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named OPTAFLEX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |