Drawing for MARGARITAVILLE

USPTO serial 78442449

MARGARITAVILLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARGARITAVILLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Smith, Esq. and Kristen L. Fancher, Esq.

Jeffrey M. Smith, Esq. and Kristen L. Fancher, Esq GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP3290 NORTHSIDE PARKWAY, SUITE 400ATLANTA, GA 30327UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Freezers; barbeque grills indoor and outdoor electric grills; indoor and outdoor gas grills; charcoal grills; domestic electric appliances, namely lanterns, indoor and outdoor lighting fixtures, refrigerators, electric beverage heaters and dispensers, electric water kettles and tea brewing apparatus, automatic bread-making machines for domestic use, electric egg cookers, electric slow cookers, electric rice and vegetable steamers, electric frying pans, electric fans, electric vaporizers and humidifiers and structural parts thereof; electric and non-electric ice cream makers; electric and non-electric ice cream freezers; smokers for cooking and smoking foods; electric roasters; rotisseries; fitted and semi-fitted vinyl covers for grills; ceramic briquettes and lava rocks for use in barbecues; wheels for grills; microwave ovens for cooking; electric popcorn poppers; electric waffle irons; electric sandwich makers; electric ice crushers; non-flammable ceramic briquettes for use in barbecue grills; electric toasters; toaster ovens; electric kettles; and electric skilletsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 29, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 29, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2005GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance