USPTO serial 78442662
GLOBAL VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROMAGHIM, PETER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBAL VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | GREETING CARDS, POSTCARDS, POSTAGE SLEEVES AND ENVELOPES, GREETING CARDS FOR HOUSING DATA STORAGE MEDIA, POSTCARDS FOR HOUSING DATA STORAGE MEDIA, POSTAGE SLEEVES FOR HOUSING DATA STORAGE MEDIA, AND POSTAGE ENVELOPES FOR HOUSING DATA STORAGE MEDIA, CARDBOARD AND PLASTIC CONTAINERS AND CARDBOARD AND PLASTIC PACKAGING FOR DATA STORAGE MEDIA AND POSTABLE AND MAILABLE CARDBOARD AND PLASTIC CONTAINERS AND CARDBOARD AND PLASTIC PACKAGING FOR HOUSING DATA STORAGE MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | GNPE | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |