Drawing for MUSEUM OF THE MIND

USPTO serial 78442683

MUSEUM OF THE MIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUSEUM OF THE MIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Warren A. Sklar

WARREN A SKLAR RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR19TH FL 1621 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Television broadcasting of programs in the field of espionage and intrigueACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing amusement complexes featuring interactive video machines, games and displays, all of the foregoing with an intrigue and espionage motif; conducting museum exhibitions and display services in the field of intrigue and espionage; museum services, namely, conducting curatorial artifact displays and archival displays in the field of intrigue and espionage; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, workshops, lectures, and conferences in the field of intrigue and espionage; organizing and conducting exhibitions in the field of intrigue and espionage; night clubs; production of programs for broadcasting in the media, namely, television, radio, Internet, and satellite, including special programs and periodic programs in the field of espionage and intrigue; and educational services, namely, providing programs in the field of espionage and intrigue, presented in kiosks, classrooms, seminars, Internet, movie theater and other media, and for broadcasting on television, radio, Internet, satellite and other media, including special programs and periodic programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance