Drawing for OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA

USPTO serial 78443040

OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Rosini, Esq.

James E. Rosini, Esq. Kenyon & Kenyon LLPOne BroadwayNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002printer supplies, namely, filled ink jet cartridgesACTIVE—
009Digital cameras, cameras, memory cards for digital cameras, camera lenses, lens hoods, lens caps, camera cases, camera straps, electronic camera flashes, batteries, battery chargers, AC adapters, binoculars, voice recorders, photo printers, computer printers, computer software for photo editing and management and computer peripherals, kiosks for viewing and printing digital images, multimedia projectors, remote controls for digital cameras, cameras, printers, projectors and voice recorders, film scanners and PDAsACTIVE—
016printer supplies, namely paperACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 9, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance