USPTO serial 78443068
CHEAP BASTARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3735288Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 5, 2010
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHEAP BASTARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Nyack, NY
West Nyack, NY
West Nyack, NY
IN THE SPIRITS GLOBAL GROUP, LLC
ORLANDO, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker BAKER AND RANNELLS PA92 E. Main Street., Suite 302Somerville, NJ 08876UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by T & C Distributors LLC
- Other trademarks owned by T & C Distributors LLC
- Other trademarks owned by T & C Distributors LLC
- Other trademarks owned by IN THE SPIRITS GLOBAL GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named CHEAP BASTARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |