USPTO serial 78443241
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Pandiscio
MARK J. PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO470 TOTTEN POND ROADSUITE 4WALTHAM, MA 02451-1933| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications and internetworking equipment, namely, optical and data networking equipment and optical switching and multiplexing equipment comprising of routers, bridges, multiplexers, demultiplexers, optical switches, packet switches, Ethernet switches, MPLS switches, GMPLS switches, ATM switches, optical amplifiers, repeaters, transmitters, receivers, transducers, transponders, optical filters, dispersion compensators, gain equalizers, circulators, optical attenuators, polarization mode dispersion compensators, polarization controllers, spectrum analyzers, optical splitters, optical combiners, optoelectronic cards, optical interconnect modules, power monitors for all of the foregoing, and computer software for controlling and monitoring all of the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | evaluations relating to commercial matters, namely, telecommunications network evaluation of associated costs | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | warranty services related to telecommunications and internetworking equipment, namely, optical networking equipment, and subsystems and supplies for the aforementioned equipment; and warranty services related to computer software for use in telecommunications and internetworking equipment, namely, optical networking equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation, upgrading, and maintenance of telecommunications and internetworking equipment and parts, systems, supplies, and computer hardware for the aforementioned equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | network operation services, telecommunications network design, planning, consulting and modeling of network architecture for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | education services, namely, training in the use and operation of telecommunications and internetworking equipment, and computer software for the aforementioned equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design and integration services for others related to telecommunications and internetworking equipment and parts, systems, supplies and computer hardware for the aforementioned equipment; and design and integration services for others related to computer software for use in telecommunications and internetworking equipment, namely, optical networking equipment; and installation, upgrading and maintenance of computer software for use in telecommunications and internetworking equipment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |