Drawing for ONRAMP

USPTO serial 78443258

ONRAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONRAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP2300 N Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the field of electronic trading in securities, stocks, futures, options, indices of any of them, and any other investment vehicles; computer software for providing financial, investment and trading information, news and research, streaming quotes, financial, investment and trading tools and databases, all for use by institutional investors in the trading and analysis of investments, finances, and financial planningACTIVE—
036Brokerage services and securities trading services provided electronically, via the Internet, and via dedicated communication networks, namely, electronic trading in securities, stocks, futures, options, indices of any of them, and any other investment vehicles; providing financial, investment and trading information, financial, investment and trading news, financial, investment and trading research, streaming quotes, financial, investment and trading tools, financial, investment and trading databases, all for use by institutional investors in the trading and analysis of investments, finances, and financial planning via the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance