Drawing for W WOLFGANG'S STEAKHOUSE

USPTO serial 78443549

W WOLFGANG'S STEAKHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with W WOLFGANG'S STEAKHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel Karni Schmidt

JOEL KARNI SCHMIDT COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant services; Restaurants featuring home and office delivery; Carry-out and Take-out restaurant servicesABANDONEDAug 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 28, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 28, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 26, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance