USPTO serial 78443629
SOLUTION IN PACKAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOLUTION IN PACKAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John T. Gabrielides
JOHN T. GABRIELIDES Brinks Hofer Gilson & LioneP.O. Box 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric switches; Encoders; Variable resistors, trimmer resistors, and potentiometers used for decreasing or increasing electrical resistance; Position sensors, pressure/weight sensors, vibration sensors, fingerprint sensors, and magnetic sensors; Electrical connectors; Recording heads for floppy disk and fixed disk drivers, namely, thin film magnetic heads; Cassette tape players, cassette tape recorders and their mechanical parts; Floppy disc drivers; Wireless communication modules, voltage controlled oscillators, transceiver units for personal handyphone systems (PHS), for digital enhanced cordless telecommunications (DECT), and for worldwide digital cordless telecommunications (WDCT), RF modulators, global positioning systems antennas, FM/AM tuners, automotive use FM/AM turners; Data communication equipment/communication satellite converters, namely satellite processors and receivers, TV receivers, cable TV converters, terrestrial tuners, namely tuners used for on-board digital TV; Liquid crystal displays; Keyboards, mouse, remote control units, computer input devices comprising a touch-sensitive grid for data entry, switch panels, namely, electrical switch plates; Control boards; Computer cursor control devices, namely, computer writing tablets; Computer keyboards; Computer mouse; Computer printers; Membrane type electronic panels, namely, control panels mounted on film boards; Organic/inorganic electroluminescence displays, namely electric luminescent display panels used for computer displays, PDAs, and their parts; Remote control units for radios, televisions, stereos; Optical components, namely, camera modules used for mobile phones with zoom actuator, camera modules used for mobile phones with fixed focus lens unit; Optical lenses; Optical devices, namely laser diodes, and light emitting diodes not for medical use; Optical filters, optical transmitters/receivers for radios, telephones, audios, videos, and optical telecommunication switches; Car electrical equipment, namely, engine starter units and battery-less tire pressure monitoring systems for contributing to driving safety; Remote keyless entry units for vehicles; Radios for vehicles, vehicle locator and recovery device programmed to use global positioning systems and cellular telecommunications; Electronic controls for motors, namely air conditioners for land vehicles; Automobile electronic controllers for controlling wipers, turn signals, power windows, and power seats; Multiple communication devices, namely, multiplex and multiple access information/data transmission units for vehicles; Wireless connectivity system consisting of devices which are radio linked to each other in a small network for vehicles, namely, theft alert systems through GPS monitoring for vehicles; Sensors for detecting headlight angle, throttle position sensors, exhaust gas recirculation, valve position sensors, and steering angle sensors. | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Safety devices, namely, clock spring connectors of air bag units. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alps Electric Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Alps Electric Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SOLUTION IN PACKAGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |