USPTO serial 78443886
GENERAL COUNSEL SYMPOSIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3036936Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2005
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GENERAL COUNSEL SYMPOSIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI Baker & McKenzie300 East Randolph Street, Suite 5000Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Baker & McKenzie
- Other trademarks owned by BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP
- Other trademarks owned by BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GENERAL COUNSEL SYMPOSIUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |