Drawing for DURABLE DEFENSE 4 WAY

USPTO serial 78443991

DURABLE DEFENSE 4 WAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURABLE DEFENSE 4 WAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas T. Johnson

DOUGLAS T JOHNSON MILLER & MARTIN PLLCSTE 1000 VOLUNTEER BLDG 832 GEORG832 GEORGIA AVECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Sunscreens and sunblocksACTIVENov 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 24, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 30, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 28, 2007CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 7, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2006CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 12, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 12, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 30, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance