Drawing for Serial No. 78444375

USPTO serial 78444375

Serial No. 78444375

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78444375?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. DREW KASTNER

W DREW KASTNER ESQ JONES DAY222 E 41ST STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020FURNITURE, NAMELY, TABLES, CHAIRS, STOOLS, STEPSTOOLS, HIGH CHAIRS, SHELVES, BOOKCASES, CABINETS, DRAWERS, BENCHES, ALL MADE OF FIBERBOARD, WICKER AND RATTAN; NON-METAL BINS FOR STORAGE; MIRRORS; HANGERS, NAMELY CLOTHES HANGERS AND COAT HANGERS; AND PLAQUESACTIVE—
027WALL COVERINGS, NAMELY, WALLPAPER, AND WALLPAPER BORDERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance