Drawing for DOE IN ESTRUS

USPTO serial 78444661

DOE IN ESTRUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOE IN ESTRUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald E. Helget

GERALD E HELGET BRIGGS & MORGAN PA80 S 8TH ST2200 IDS CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028BUCK LURES AND DOE SCENTS USED IN HUNTINGACTIVEJun 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 18, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 21, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 20, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 23, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 23, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 29, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 29, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 20, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance